<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will 2009 be the year of the ccTLD???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ozdomainer.com/will-2009-be-the-year-of-the-cctld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ozdomainer.com/will-2009-be-the-year-of-the-cctld/</link>
	<description>The Word on Domain Names from Down Under!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:31:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.ozdomainer.com/will-2009-be-the-year-of-the-cctld/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozdomainer.com/?p=241#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Absolutely agree.  With most domainers coming from the states where the COM is seen as the defacto US ccTLD as well as the top gTLD, investment has concentrated in this area.

However in the meantime the ccTLD&#039;s have been quietly doing their thing with end-users pushing the registrations.

Remember without end-users domainers are nothing!  Wish I spoke Indian &amp; Chinese languages...

*********************************************************
Hi David,

I could not agree more, there are still HUGE opportunities in countries such as China &amp; India.

In regards to the language challenge, India has English as one of its main languages so I have not found
it to be a problem (our people that write content for us in India are better writers than I am)

So I have a big focus on India at the moment and keep picking up great Indian .co.in &amp; .in names every week.
Who knows I could be wrong about this but in 5 - 10 years or even less I will find out.

Regards

Ed



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely agree.  With most domainers coming from the states where the COM is seen as the defacto US ccTLD as well as the top gTLD, investment has concentrated in this area.</p>
<p>However in the meantime the ccTLD&#8217;s have been quietly doing their thing with end-users pushing the registrations.</p>
<p>Remember without end-users domainers are nothing!  Wish I spoke Indian &amp; Chinese languages&#8230;</p>
<p>*********************************************************<br />
Hi David,</p>
<p>I could not agree more, there are still HUGE opportunities in countries such as China &#038; India.</p>
<p>In regards to the language challenge, India has English as one of its main languages so I have not found<br />
it to be a problem (our people that write content for us in India are better writers than I am)</p>
<p>So I have a big focus on India at the moment and keep picking up great Indian .co.in &#038; .in names every week.<br />
Who knows I could be wrong about this but in 5 &#8211; 10 years or even less I will find out.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timo Reitnauer</title>
		<link>http://www.ozdomainer.com/will-2009-be-the-year-of-the-cctld/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Timo Reitnauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozdomainer.com/?p=241#comment-135</guid>
		<description>The ccTLD has always been there. In my opinion it&#039;s just now that US (or maybe English speaking in general?) domainers start looking beyond their own nose and realise that it&#039;s not all about the gTLDs. I predict the the same for IDNs in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ccTLD has always been there. In my opinion it&#8217;s just now that US (or maybe English speaking in general?) domainers start looking beyond their own nose and realise that it&#8217;s not all about the gTLDs. I predict the the same for IDNs in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
